This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
On September 29, 2021, during a regularly scheduled meeting, the Liquor and Cannabis Board took the following actions on these Board Interim Policies (BIP): Liquor Policies Rescinded (Withdrawn) : LCB Policy Number 00-4 about exceptions to liquor license fee refund procedures. It is no longer necessary and was rescinded.
With hemp already federally legal, a primary policy issue is how marijuana and hemp—two varieties of the cannabis plant—would be distinguished under a federal regulatory regime. We strongly encourage participation in this important opportunity to shape federal cannabis policy. Distinction between Cannabis and Hemp Under the CAOA.
This Board Interim Policy is effective immediately and retroactive to Oct. WSLCB licensed processors may accept banned vapor products and issue a refund, credit, or exchange of similar product, not to exceed the acquisition cost of the product being returned, until December 31, 2019. Returns for Credit.
The case stemmed from requests for tax refunds by producers in 2014 and again in 2018. We respect the decision and will move forward to issue refunds to the affected taxpayers once the court’s decision is mandated to become final,” agency spokesman Charlie Moore said. It wasn’t immediately unclear how much the refunds might total.
The ruling, which overturned a hearing officer’s decision, could carry a multimillion-dollar price tag for the state Taxation and Revenue Department, which had denied medical cannabis producers’ applications for gross receipts tax refunds for years. Candelaria suggested the ruling could affect workplace policies on medical cannabis use.
The Financial Markets Authority (FMA) has penalised the medicinal cannabis company Medical Kiwi $250,000 and ordered it to offer a refund to investors, after it admitted to making false claims during its equity raise in 2020. RNZ report.
Alternatively, those seeking a refund can email CannabisCupHelp.” Anyone who bought tickets to legally use marijuana at the Cal Expo the weekend before Halloween may be eligible for a refund. Alternatively, those seeking a refund can email CannabisCupHelp. December 8, 2019. Hours after that the Oct. Jerry Brown on Sept.
The pardons, however, will not result in a reduction or refund of any fines or fees paid to the court. Reforming policy surrounding cannabis not only serves our state in producing hundreds of millions of dollars in revenues, but is an important step in reducing arrests and expunging records.
IHH requested a refund of payment. Plaintiff’s claim pled relief for the funds not refunded and attorney fees in connection with the suit. Full payment of $182,000 was made to Frye. The Cubes were not delivered. ICT had sold the Cubes to another party. California does not recognize relief for a claim of unjust enrichment.
This process requires submitting personal information, medical documentation, and a non-refundable application fee. By remaining engaged and proactive, individuals can advocate for policies that promote access, affordability, and patient-centric care within the medical marijuana program.
Application fee (non-refundable). State application fees alone can run into the six figures, which are not only non-refundable but don’t account for the other cost inputs necessary for creating a compelling application. The cost of opening a cannabis business. License fee. Annual registration/renewal fee. Real estate.
The Tax Court is a prepayment forum in which taxpayers are permitted to contest tax liabilities without first paying the tax and claiming a refund. The Tax Court will only reluctantly consider policy. Deductions can be reduced or expanded in accordance with Congress’ policy objectives [5]. Judge Mark V.
NCCR 5.085 Surrender of license if cannabis establishment has not received final inspection; extension of time for final inspection; fee not refundable. NCCR 6.075 Development, documentation and implementation of certain policies and procedures; maintenance and availability. for discussion only). for discussion only).
The USPS Final Rule basically says “not my problem” (in reality the USPS said that these comments were “misdirected”) and indicates that the ATF and these state agencies will have to deal with this confusion through their own rule and policy making. Exceptions. Consumer Testing.
I] ultimately decided to leave and I got a partial refund.”. She was a Harkness Fellow in Health Care Policy, a VicHealth Fellow in Health Promotion and an NHMRC Fellow in Suicide Prevention. He consulted with state and federal regulators to design policy and legislation. He has a B.Sc. Neuropsychology), LL.B,
Most industry analysts expect the federal government’s policies eventually will change and ultimately accommodate cannabis retailing within the bounds of reasonable regulations. Banks, landlords, insurance companies and other service providers remain skittish about doing business with companies that are essentially breaking federal law.
And when it comes to cannabis and public policy, the FTC is much closer to the NLRB than, let’s say, the IRS. This case marks the first time , though, that consumers are also getting refunds for products purchased, the cost of which of course must be borne by Kushly.
while others may ensue from regulations or policies adopted after a parcel last changed hands. I like earnest money in deals, even if it’s wholly or partially refundable, and even if it’s just in the form of a promissory note or something similar. It’s hard enough to find one that will extend a title policy.)
So CBD companies on the receiving end of this letter – or who receive similar letters in the future – may have a difficult time sifting through the FTC’s myriad different policies. As mentioned, we will probably dive further into these topics in future blog posts, but wanted to get a short summary out now.
The California Medical Association Board of Trustees (back in 1994 and then again in 2010) adopted policies instructing physicians on what business/practice decisions have to be made by the physicians exclusively, versus those business decisions or actions that may be shared between physicians and non-physicians.
Kentucky Issues Initial Licenses To Cannabis Businesses When applications opened, five thousand applicants (4,000 of which were dispensaries) totaling $28 million in non-refundable fees submitted forms for medical marijuana business licenses. These applications flooded in during the two-month window for applying that ended in October of 2024.
Tim Morland, Compliance & Policy Director, River Distribution Tim was previously Director of Legislative and Regulatory Affairs, for the Board of Equalization. We also have Tim Morland who is the Compliance and Policy Director River Distribution, and asked not give the long bio. Round of applause for himl. So pretty important.
Immediately, regulators in other states with newly legalized programs will seek to avoid similar pitfalls while striking an effective regulatory balance: Oregon’s unlimited license policy is an opposite example of what other states yet prefer to avoid. Or this Conceptual framework: State efforts to legalize regulate cannabis.
In 2018, SBA issued a Policy Statement defining “Direct Marijuana Business” and “Indirect Marijuana Business.” The Policy Statement explained that those two categories of businesses are not eligible SBA borrowers. This is not a new SBA position. The next 10 weeks are paid at 2/3 of employee’s regular wage, capped at $200/day.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 14,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content