NewsMunchies
JULY 1, 2021
Justice Thomas said the Supreme Court’s ruling in 2005 upholding federal laws making marijuana possession illegal may now be out of date. In his 5-page statement, Thomas noted that the Supreme Court had upheld federal prohibition of marijuana even within states in its 2005 decision in Gonzales v. However, the 10th U.S.
Cannabis Law Report
JUNE 30, 2021
Calling the broader situation a “contradictory and unstable state of affairs,” Thomas wrote that the current legal landscape “strains basic principles of federalism and conceals traps for the unwary.” ” Thomas went on to note also how merely having both marijuana and a firearm could lead to a person “find[ing] himself a federal felon.”.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Cannabis Law Report
JUNE 6, 2022
This statement was made in connection with the denial of a petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in the case of Standing Akimbo, LLC v. United States. 1, 5 (2005). Raich, 545 U. In 2009, Congress enabled Washington D.
Cannabis Law Report
MARCH 3, 2020
Protection from criminal or civil penalties for patients using therapeutic marijuana and related cannabinoids as permitted under state laws. ? As a result, patients and families who gain access to or use marijuana for therapeutic purposes in a state that allows for its use are still at risk for criminal consequences. .
Cannabis Law Report
JUNE 3, 2022
Posted: 2005. Law & Economics #: 05-21. Author(s): Maxwell Stearns. Availability: Full text (most recent) on SSRN. ABSTRACT: In Gonzales v.
SpeedWeed
JULY 8, 2021
Congress has also specifically blocked the justice department from taking action against medical pot states for nearly a decade now. Thomas went on to note how the government’s overall cannabis policies have shifted since 2005, when the Supreme Court made a landmark ruling against California’s medical marijuana program.
SMPL
JULY 13, 2020
He was later convicted of simple robbery in 1992 and 1993, simple burglary in 1997, theft under $500 in 2005 and distribution of marijuana. Crain, the lone dissenter, objected to what he described as the court “creating an additional basis for post-conviction relief” under the state law.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content