2005 Access Cultivation Policy 
Cannabis Law Report
SEPTEMBER 9, 2021
The current public policies in local and state cannabis ordinance and equity programs may enhance racial disparities if they follow the pattern of exclusion and criminalization that encompass past policies promoted as beneficial to African Americans but uphold racial capitalistic practices. Authored By: By Dr. Ayoka Nurse.
Cannabis Law Report
JUNE 28, 2021
Thomas wrote that a 2005 Supreme Court ruling – Gonzales v. Whatever the merits of Raich when it was decided, federal policies of the past 16 years have greatly undermined its reasoning,” Thomas wrote. 20-645_9p6b. This contradictory and unstable state of affairs strains the basic principle of federalism,” he wrote.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Cannabis Law Report
JULY 20, 2021
The creation of this standalone cannabis department is part of a larger effort to improve access to licensure, simplify regulatory oversight and support California businesses. Eidson was the Assistant Director of the California Department of Food and Agriculture’s CalCannabis Cultivation Licensing Division.
Canna Law Blog
JUNE 3, 2022
Well, various influential marijuana companies and stakeholders are joining to sue the federal government over alleged unconstitutional policies which affect their operations. In 2005 the Supreme Court ruled along these lines in Gonzales v. So what is happening? This is according to the CEO of one of the companies joining the suit.
Cannabis Law Report
SEPTEMBER 12, 2021
I was appointed to the NCUA in 2005 under President Bush and served a four-year term that ended in 2009. Here’s a basic reality: as a rule, regulators really don’t like to get out too far ahead of the policy process. We always seek to respect the existing statutes and to defer to Congress as the policy-making arm of the government.
Cannabis Law Report
NOVEMBER 18, 2019
Bill’s Nursery wanted to obtain a medical marijuana license in Florida but did not meet required criteria (experience cultivating medical cannabis) and was unable to apply. Furthermore, even if the contract violated the CSA, public policy under the Ninth Circuit decision in Bassidji argued for enforcement. 3) Not against public policy.
Cannabis Law Report
NOVEMBER 24, 2021
However, the nature of the government regulations and the subsequent complexity of prescribing, as well as doctors’ safety uncertainties and the stigma of the plant, remain contributing barriers to patient access. Patients can legally access medicinal cannabis through a doctor, via the TGA’s Authorised Prescribers and Special Access schemes.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
105 
Let's personalize your content