Canna Law Blog

NOVEMBER 1, 2020

This November 2020 election, cannabis legalization initiatives will appear on the ballots of five states: Arizona, Mississippi, Montana, New Jersey, and South Dakota. In South Dakota, the possession or consumption of any amount of cannabis is illegal. Moreover, the state only recently established the legality of CBD.

Legalization 83

Legalization Recreational Conditions Decriminalization 83

Cannabis Law Report

MARCH 9, 2019

The decision caused outcry amongst pro-cannabis groups having come almost out of the blue, and now the legal troops have been mobilised in a bid to overturn the decision. and derived products containing cannabinoids are considered novel foods as a history of consumption has not been demonstrated. LEGAL 500, 2015.

CBD 87

CBD Food Seed-To-Sale Extraction 87

Greencamp

AUGUST 16, 2018

Brief history of ALS. The first study I will reference is from 2006, conducted on mice. As for the side effects of cannabis consumption, patients noted vertigo, soreness of throat, dry mouth , red eyes and difficulties with coordination.

Strains 94

Strains Cannabinoids Research and Development Indica 94

Cannabis Law Report

JUNE 2, 2022

State legalization of cannabis (i.e., Cannabis regulations are complicated: although individual states have legalized medical or personal use, it remains federally illegal. THC metabolism (adapted from Musshoff and Madea, 2006). Durations for urine detection primarily vary with dose consumed and use history (i.e.,

THC 52

THC Concentrates History Cannabis 52

Cannabis Law Report

OCTOBER 14, 2021

Tiffiny Walls-Fox is a partner at Edlin Gallagher Huie + Blum with 13 years of experience practicing law who takes an entrepreneurial approach to helping clients resolve their most daunting legal challenges. In 2006 Tiffiny earned her J.D. in history. from the University of Miami School of Law, graduating cum laude.

Research and Development 52

Research and Development Cannabis Safety Law 52

The Cannigma

FEBRUARY 22, 2021

This trial took place between 2006 and 2011 and involved 1,228 participants from Pennsylvania, New York, Utah, and Colorado. Regardless of any underlying mechanisms, several other studies have linked prenatal cannabis consumption with less preferable birth outcomes. Why the difference?

Clinical Trials 83

Clinical Trials Cannabis History Education 83

The Cannigma

FEBRUARY 22, 2021

This trial took place between 2006 and 2011 and involved 1,228 participants from Pennsylvania, New York, Utah, and Colorado. Regardless of any underlying mechanisms, several other studies have linked prenatal cannabis consumption with less preferable birth outcomes. Why the difference?

Clinical Trials 52

Clinical Trials Cannabis History Education 52