2013 Collective Programs State Laws 
Cannabis Law Report
MAY 26, 2022
Instead, adult-use dispensaries in the state are proving the system works by checking IDs as required by state law. 2010, Elvik, 2013, Hartman and Huestis, 2013, Rogeberg and Elvik, 2016). A new study disproves the theory that dispensaries make it easier for teens to get cannabis. 2012, Calabria et al.,
Canna Law Blog
JANUARY 11, 2022
The War on Cannabis continues through aggressive state and local enforcement and prohibition measures with no end in sight. This is all very bad and we collectively need to figure out how to get people to comply with state law rather than penalizing everything. This left enforcement to state regulators. Conclusion.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Canna Law Blog
NOVEMBER 13, 2021
215 opened the door for a collective model (i.e., With the passage of SB 420 , this collective system was formalized and, with the advent of the 2008 Guidelines issued by the State Attorney General’s Office, more details around “compliance” and best practices were provided; but it was nothing like we have today under Prop.
Cannabis Law Report
NOVEMBER 22, 2019
It will allow federal executive branch agencies to collect and test an oral fluid specimen as part of their drug testing programs.” [vii]. Oral fluid testing although growing in popularity [viii] is not without some stated issues. uid is collected.” [ix] 141 (2013); Birchfield v. i] Missouri v. McNeely , 569 U.S.
Cannabis Law Report
AUGUST 8, 2019
THC (legal term “marijuana”) is classified as a Schedule 1 drug and is illegal under federal law for any purpose (with the exception of FDA-approved research programs) by way of the Controlled Substances Act 1970. the sale of shares or assets and collection of dividends outside the U.K. In the U.S., Source: [link].
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content