Equally important, the vision needs the support of successive governments over decades. Sydney first identified Parramatta as its second CBD back in 1968 and that status has remained in successive plans. On the other hand, there has been no consistency in the Melbourne preference over the past three decades.
The quality and experiences available along the corridor from the MCG to the Exhibition Building, on the south side of the Yarra River, demonstrate the benefit of consistent decisions in investments over a long period. Similarly, the approach to building a second CBD must address the amenity of a place and the variety of cultural, entertainment and recreational activities commensurate with creating a sense of place.
An artist’s impression on turning Parramatta into Sydney’s second CBD.
Such investments could be used to create a vibrant urban heart in a location such as the Monash precinct, one of the suggested locations.
Lastly, delivering jobs closer to home, to negate the long commute, is an underlying narrative in the CBD series. Planners need to recognise that our actions cannot create jobs. A range of actions must make a location more attractive for businesses and investment. This includes allowing for growth in a centre, and if we are talking about a second CBD, that means harbouring significant growth.
Loading
The amenity of a place will influence its attractiveness for many businesses, such as those involved in the knowledge economy. In attracting knowledge…
