Remove 2005 Remove Dispensary Remove Policy Remove State Laws
article thumbnail

Statements by Justice Clarence Thomas Are Not an Endorsement of Marijuana

NewsMunchies

The High Court on June 28, 2021 rejected the challenge from Standing Akimbo LLC , which operates a state-legal medical marijuana dispensary in Denver, Colorado. United States , the U.S. Supreme Court said it would not hear an appeal in a case brought by this Colorado medical marijuana dispensary. Under the U.S.

article thumbnail

DLG Learning Center: Half In, Half Out – Standing Akimbo, LLC v. United States, 594 U.S. (2021)

Cannabis Law Report

This statement was made in connection with the denial of a petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in the case of Standing Akimbo, LLC v. United States. 1, 5 (2005). The petitioners in this case lawfully operate a medium medical-marijuana dispensary in Colorado. Raich, 545 U.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas Condemns Prohibition of Cannabis in the US

SpeedWeed

“This contradictory and unstable state of affairs strains basic principles of federalism and conceals traps for the unwary.”. Justice Thomas pointed out that the government has taken a hands-off policy towards state-legal medical cannabis businesses, even though federal law specifically prohibits marijuana in all forms.

Policy 52
article thumbnail

Lighting Up Florida Medical Marijuana People: The Crusaders, Part 7

Cannabis Law Report

They are paying attention, slowly formulating bits and pieces of vital international, federal, and state public marijuana policy. ” CannaMD , outlining marijuana laws from state to state , explains that “This question comes down to federal versus state law.” Think again.

article thumbnail

Warning For Immigrants: Marijuana Could Impact Your Immigration Status

Cannabis Law Report

The Supreme Court has held that even growing and using a marijuana plant at home for medical purposes, in accordance with state law, is an activity regulated by federal law because it may affect interstate commerce. Gonzales v. Raich , 545 U.S. INA § 101(f)(3).